Torey Lanez will not be taking place quietly. Only a day after Megan Thee Stallion filed a restraining order in opposition to Lanez, claiming that he’s harassing her from behind bars, the controversial Canadian artist is firing again.
In authorized paperwork that had been launched on Wednesday, Lanez’s attorneys accuse Megan of not being truthful about her accusations, writing, “In regard to the ridiculous declare {that a} writ of habeas corpus was truly filed previous to the discharge of Ms. Pete’s documentary in an try and undermine her work is ludicrous, we wish to level out that appellate courts impose strict timelines for when filings and responses should happen.”
“Are the accusers now suggesting that the courts try to disrupt Ms. Pete’s documentary? Our consumer, Mr. Peterson, was merely complying with these authorized deadlines, as required by the courts,” the letter concludes.
The assertion additionally urged the general public to not “leap to conclusions” after Megan’s attorneys confirmed receipts of $3,000 paid to blogger Milagra Gramz, who the rapper claims is working with Lanez to put up misinformation in regards to the “Greater In Texas” rapper on social media and the case that resulted within the Canadian singer being sentenced to 10 years in jail.
Learn all the assertion beneath:
On Tuesday, Megan’s attorneys filed a petition in Los Angeles Superior Courtroom, asking a decide to cease Lanez from hiring different folks to harass the Houston rapper on-line.
Per the Related Press, the petition learn, “Even now, whereas behind bars, Mr. Peterson exhibits no indicators of stopping. Regardless of being sentenced to 10 years in jail for taking pictures Ms. Pete, Mr. Peterson continues to to topic her to repeated trauma and revictimization.”
Final week, Megan’s attorneys made comparable allegations in opposition to Lanez, claiming to have entry to name logs that hear Torey and his father speaking about working with Milagra Gramz to unfold lies about Megan.
On the alleged cellphone calls, “the Petersons confidently asserted that Ms. Pete could be unable to show that Mr. Peterson paid Defendant for attacking Ms. Pete,” in line with authorized paperwork.
Take into account, that this restraining order has not been made official, and a listening to for the order is scheduled to happen on Jan. 9.