The drama continues to unfold within the high-stakes divorce battle between The Actual Housewives of Atlanta star Porsha Williams and her estranged husband, Nigerian businessman Simon Guobadia. Final month, Porsha secured a hard-fought victory permitting her to movie contained in the sprawling Georgia mansion the couple as soon as shared – however Simon isn’t backing down simply but.
In keeping with In Contact, Simon has filed a movement urging a choose to rethink the choice that granted Porsha the best to movie RHOA throughout the marital residence. Court docket paperwork reveal Simon’s plea to vacate the November 19 order, citing procedural inconsistencies and the shortage of a proper listening to.
Simon’s authorized group claims that the court docket contradicted itself. In March, the choose reportedly indicated that the difficulty of filming would require a listening to. Nevertheless, Simon argued that the November order allowing Porsha to proceed with filming was issued with out the presentation of proof or an official listening to.
His lawyer asserted, “Simon recordsdata this Movement to Vacate Order on Filming in Marital Residence and seeks to have this Court docket vacate its November 19, 2024 Order as a result of the Court docket didn’t conduct a listening to because it beforehand indicated it might on the difficulty, the Court docket didn’t obtain any proof to assist its ruling, and fairness calls for that this Court docket vacates the Order.”
On the coronary heart of Simon’s argument is Porsha’s justification for filming – her employment with The Actual Housewives of Atlanta. Simon contends that regardless of her claims, Porsha has but to supply supporting paperwork associated to her RHOA employment, together with the phrases of her contract and wage particulars.
His authorized group said, “On one hand [Porsha] desires to make use of her employment to acquire reduction from the Court docket, however then again she desires to make use of the Court docket to keep away from offering documentation of her employment to [Simon] to forestall him from getting ready a protection in opposition to [Porsha’s] claims. Moreover, [Porsha] has been selective about what provisions of the prenuptial settlement she desires this Court docket to implement for her profit and what provisions of the prenuptial settlement she desires this Court docket to disregard when doing so advantages her.”
Thought?