Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto through Getty Photographs
What can be former President Joe Biden’s legacy? How will People sooner or later contemplate his 4 years in workplace?
Each American president lands within the historical past books. And historians’ assessments of their efficiency have been typically constant over time. However some presidents’ rankings have modified because the nation – and historians themselves – reassessed the nation’s values and priorities.
Historians have been rating presidents in surveys since Arthur Schlesinger Sr.’s first such research appeared in Life journal in 1948. The outcomes of that survey categorized Presidents Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson as “nice.”
On the different finish of the rating, Presidents Ulysses S. Grant and Warren Harding had been labeled “failure.”
There have been quite a few surveys rating presidents since then, together with a 1962 survey by Arthur Schlesinger Jr., which confirmed Jackson dropping right into a “close to nice” class.
Altering views shift rankings
Whereas the surveys level to People’ evolving social attitudes, with implications for our electoral politics and governance, they don’t all the time ask historians the identical questions. Some merely ask them to rank presidents. Others ask them to additionally decide particular features of management, equivalent to financial coverage or worldwide diplomacy.
Regardless of the relative stability of the rankings throughout surveys – particularly on the high, the place Lincoln, Washington and Roosevelt persistently maintain sway – there have been some dramatic adjustments. C-SPAN’s 4 surveys on presidential management, for instance, present some shifts in historians’ rating of presidents over time.
Since 2000, the cable community has polled distinguished historians each time there was a change in administrations. So, C-SPAN performed surveys in 2009, 2017 and 2021 as properly. The 2025 survey, which is able to assess Biden’s presidency, is within the works.
The surveys supply not solely an general rating of presidents but in addition rankings in every of the next 10 classes: public persuasion, disaster management, financial administration, ethical authority, worldwide relations, administrative expertise, relations with Congress, imaginative and prescient and agenda setting, pursuance of equal justice for all, and efficiency throughout the context of the instances.
Whereas Lincoln has ranked on the high of every survey, the 2 presidents who served proper earlier than him – Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan, each sympathetic to slavery – and his speedy successor, white supremacist Andrew Johnson, have persistently ranked on the backside.
Donald Trump debuted in C-SPAN’s 2021 survey close to the underside, ranked forty first of 45 presidents. The score for his first time period, from 2017 to 2021, might change within the 2025 survey; his present presidency can be assessed after he leaves workplace.
The Print Collector/Hulton Archive through Getty Photographs
What is an efficient chief?
As a social psychologist and management scholar on the College of Richmond’s Jepson Faculty of Management Research, with long-standing pursuits in presidential management, I consider these surveys will be finest understood when it comes to psychologist Dean Keith Simonton’s mannequin of evaluating presidents.
He maintains that historians typically view leaders, together with presidents, positively to the extent that they match a deeply ingrained picture of somebody who is powerful, energetic and good. And that picture involves thoughts after they consider attributes and occasions linked to a president that recommend he was chief. Examples embrace how lengthy he served, whether or not he was a warfare hero and whether or not he was assassinated, and in that sense, was a martyr.
Then again, historians additionally simply recall scandals, equivalent to Richard Nixon’s Watergate and Harding’s Teapot Dome. These detract from these presidents’ “good” picture, as evidenced by Nixon’s and Harding’s rankings of thirty first and thirty seventh, respectively, in C-SPAN’s 2021 survey.
Race issues
In recent times, presidents’ positions on race and racism have been essential elements in historians’ evaluations of their data. For instance, Wilson’s reasonably startling efforts to segregate federal workplaces and the navy have gotten extra broadly often called students discover that side of his presidency.
His actions in that regard might overshadow his worldwide idealism, which favored morality over materialism and has been seen positively. He’s not thought-about one in every of our “nice” presidents. In Schlesinger Sr.’s 1948 survey, he ranked fourth of 29 presidents. However in 2021, historians ranked him thirteenth of 45 for C-SPAN.
Jackson dropped probably the most in C-SPAN’s surveys, from thirteenth in 2000 to twenty second in 2021. His dedication to Indian elimination from Southern and Midwestern states, not distinctive for the time, and the ensuing Path of Tears – the compelled and violent relocation of Native People from their homelands – are essential subjects in right this moment’s political discussions.
A number of different presidents who misplaced floor, together with James Polk, Zachary Taylor, Rutherford B. Hayes and Grover Cleveland, had been related to efforts to increase slavery or with failure to guard African People following Reconstruction.
Then there’s the case of Grant. Ranked on the backside as a failure within the mid-Twentieth century, he had the biggest rating change of any president within the C-SPAN surveys. He jumped 13 locations from thirty third in 2000 to Twentieth in 2021. He had already moved up from second-to-last place within the 1948 and 1962 Schlesinger surveys to someplace within the backside quartile in 2000, to a place in 2021 the place extra presidents ranked worse than he did.
The 2021 C-SPAN survey ranks Grant sixth on “pursued equal justice for all,” behind solely Lincoln, Lyndon Johnson, Barack Obama, Harry Truman and Jimmy Carter. Given the centrality of equal justice, which can overshadow no matter connection Grant might have needed to scandals in his administration, equivalent to Crédit Mobilier and the Whiskey Ring, Grant rises in historians’ general analysis.
Ethical authority
This all suggests historians have fairly easy methods of evaluating presidents. We’ve a picture of the perfect chief.
Print Collector/Hulton Archive through Getty Photographs
Only a few items of data regarding that ultimate make a giant distinction in whether or not we view presidents as becoming or not becoming that picture. That is notably true of our notion of how good they had been. Presidents’ ethical commitments communicate loudly as to whether or not we view them nearly as good.
Curiously, on the standard of “ethical authority” within the C-SPAN surveys from 2000 to 2021, Grant’s rating rose 14 rungs, from thirty first to seventeenth, much more than it did on “pursued equal justice for all,” the place it rose 12 rungs, from 18th to sixth. Wilson and Jackson dropped 13 and 18 locations, respectively, on “ethical authority.”
Clearly, ethical judgments loom giant in historians’ assessments of presidential management.
Editor’s notice: This story has been up to date to replicate the 2025 switch of energy from President Biden to President Trump.
George R. Goethals, Professor in Management Research, College of Richmond
This text is republished from The Dialog underneath a Inventive Commons license. Learn the unique article.