Sean “Diddy” Combs’ attorneys are preventing again in opposition to certainly one of his fees, arguing that the prosecution is racially biased and based mostly on a regulation, initially often known as the White-Slave Visitors Act, handed over a century in the past. “This case is unprecedented in some ways,” the movement obtained by AllHipHop states. “However maybe most notably, and most […]
Sean “Diddy” Combs’ attorneys are preventing again in opposition to certainly one of his fees, arguing that the prosecution is racially biased and based mostly on a regulation, initially often known as the White-Slave Visitors Act, handed over a century in the past.
“This case is unprecedented in some ways,” the movement obtained by AllHipHop states. “However maybe most notably, and most disturbingly, no white particular person has ever been the goal of a remotely related prosecution.”
The incarcerated mogul’s attorneys filed a movement to dismiss Depend Three of the Superseding Indictment of their movement filed Tuesday (February 18), highlighting what they declare is selective enforcement in opposition to Combs as a result of his race and standing.
The indictment cites the Mann Act, initially often known as the White-Slave Visitors Act of 1910, designed to ban the transportation of ladies or ladies throughout state strains for prostitution, debauchery, or different immoral functions.
Nonetheless, Diddy’s authorized group argued that the fees in opposition to Combs represented an unjust software of the regulation. Particularly, the submitting notes that “there has by no means been an analogous RICO prosecution” and that “no different particular person, and positively no white particular person, has ever beforehand been prosecuted beneath the White-Slave Visitors Act for hiring male escorts from one other State.”
Moreover, the rapper’s attorneys assert the Mann Act has “an extended and troubling historical past as a statute with racist origins, used to focus on Black males and supposedly shield White ladies from them.”
Diddy’ Attorneys Accuse Prosecution Of Bias
The protection claims the prosecution is rooted in racial discrimination, stating, “Mr. Combs has been singled out as a result of he’s a strong Black man, and he’s being prosecuted for conduct that recurrently goes unpunished.”
The movement additional critiques the historic use of the Mann Act, asserting, “What was racist in its inception has usually been racist in its operation.”
In line with the submitting, the case in opposition to Combs is constructed largely on allegations that he and two longtime girlfriends sometimes employed male escorts. The protection argues that “the federal government has concocted a legal case based mostly totally on allegations that Mr. Combs and two of his longtime girlfriends generally introduced a 3rd get together—a male escort—into their sexual relationship.”
Past the fees themselves, the protection argues that the prosecution has engaged in conduct supposed to wreck Combs’ fame and bias potential jurors. “The federal government’s dealing with of this case demonstrates bias and animus. It has gone out of its approach to humiliate Mr. Combs and to prejudice the jury pool with pretrial publicity that performs on racist tropes. It has leaked damaging (and oftentimes false) materials to the press,” the movement claims.
At the moment, Diddy stays in federal custody in Brooklyn on fees of intercourse trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation to interact in prostitution.
His trial is ready to start in Might.