Quick-term landlords would possibly not find a way to sh-sh-shake it off relating to the extra taxes they might be answerable for. This follows the introduction of Rhode Island’s “Taylor Swift tax,” the nickname given to part-time residents who personal trip leases.
With different states following swimsuit, tensions are escalating between native municipalities, brokers, brokers, and the rich property house owners they signify.
What’s the Taylor Swift Tax?
The so-called Taylor Swift tax—formally referred to as the Non-Proprietor-Occupied Property Tax Act—will take impact on July 1, 2026. It imposes an annual surcharge on non-primary residences (i.e., properties not occupied by their house owners or tenants for a minimum of 183 days a yr) that are valued at greater than $1 million.
The surcharge is ready at $2.50 for each $500 of assessed worth above that threshold. Utilizing these metrics, Kiplinger calculated {that a} $3 million property would face a surcharge of roughly $10,000 yearly, along with common property taxes.
The tax was named after the pop famous person as a result of Swift bought a mansion within the upscale Watch Hill part of Rhode Island in 2013, the place she is a part-time resident. It’s estimated that she will probably be liable for an additional $136,000 yearly when the brand new tax takes impact.
Proponents and Opponents
The aim of the extra levy, in response to the state, is to increase income that helps housing initiatives whereas lowering the variety of residences that stay vacant for a lot of the yr. Within the case of short-term landlords, this could possibly be devastating to their backside line, as they might not solely be taxed on the income they make as a landlord, but in addition from the Taylor Swift tax too, in the event that they hire the house for greater than 183 days a yr however not as a long-term rental.
The brand new tax has not been properly acquired by many inside the true property business. “These are individuals who simply come right here for the summer time, spend their cash, and pay their justifiable share of taxes,” Donna Krueger-Simmons, gross sales agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby’s Worldwide in Watch Hill, Rhode Island, advised CNBC. “They’re getting penalized simply because additionally they stay someplace else.”
“You’re simply hurting the individuals who assist small enterprise,” Lori Joyal of the Lila Delman Compass workplace in Watch Hill, advised CNBC. “You’re chasing away the individuals who spend many of the cash in these cities.”
Brokers concern that the tax might backfire on trip owners, who would possibly select to spend their cash on close by trip cities with much less stringent tax legal guidelines.
Different States Are Implementing Comparable Taxes
Montana
Montana lately handed reforms set to take impact in 2026, which equally distinguish between major residences and long-term leases versus secondary/trip properties and short-term leases. The state skilled an inflow of recent residents from New York and different main cities through the COVID-19 pandemic.
Montana’s new system would require non-primary residents and short-term rental house owners to pay a flat fee of 1.90% starting in 2026, whatever the property worth. Nevertheless, properties used as major residences or for long-term leases can qualify for decrease, tiered charges, relying on market values, in response to the Montana Division of Income.
There are caveats to Montana’s program. Owners who stay of their residences for a minimum of seven months of the yr, or have long-term leases, might qualify for diminished charges and a one-time rebate for 2025, in response to tax compliance website Avalara. The location additionally estimates that second properties and higher-value properties will bear a larger proportion of the tax burden on account of their increased tax charges.
Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Cape Cod is contemplating becoming a member of close by Rhode Island in taxing prosperous part-time residents. Nevertheless, somewhat than an annual tax, Cape Cod will apply a “mansion tax” within the type of a 2% actual property switch tax on gross sales of over $2 million. Proponents argue that it might generate round $56 million yearly for inexpensive and year-round housing.
Rob Brennan, chief authorized officer on the nonprofit group Housing Help, advised Cape Cod’s native authorities web site:
“This is not a cyclical scarcity—it’s an existential disaster. With no everlasting, predictable supply of funding, we can not assist housing that working Cape Codders can really afford. There’s no method out of this disaster with out daring, systemic options. The $2,000,000 dwelling turning into $2,040,000 doesn’t cease second-home patrons.”
Conversely, full-time residents in Chatham, Cape Cod, will obtain a 35% property tax exemption as of July 1, 2026.
“The huge quantity of wealth on this city in residential property is held by a disproportionate quantity of people that aren’t residents of this city,” Chatham neighborhood board member Seth Taylor advised the Cape Cod Chronicle. “I don’t assume it’s an excessive amount of to ask to take a look at this as a practical method to assist the middle-income people that we are saying we wish to have in our neighborhood.”
Chatham and 10 different communities on the Cape and islands, in addition to six different cities and cities throughout the state, together with Boston, have adopted a residential tax exemption.
California
Los Angeles’ “mansion tax,” referred to as Measure ULA, imposes a 4% switch tax on property gross sales between $5 million and $10 million, and a 5.5% tax on gross sales above $10 million to assist inexpensive housing and homeless prevention applications. Nevertheless, the tax has lately been beneath scrutiny and will be eradicated to encourage growth.
“It was bought as a mansion tax, which implies large homes for wealthy individuals, but it surely really had a chilling impact on housing development, significantly residences,” former Meeting Speaker Bob Hertzberg, who was tapped by Mayor Karen Bass to work out the small print of the legislative proposal, advised the Los Angeles Occasions.
Issues Quick-Time period Rental Homeowners Ought to Maintain In Thoughts
In the event you personal a short-term rental in states like Rhode Island or Montana, you’ll need to pay explicit consideration to:
- The variety of days you reside within the property personally as a major residence versus the times you hire it.
- Maintain information of residency use dates versus short-term and mid-term rental occupancy.
- Weigh the revenue generated from the rental versus the tax payable by not occupying it to qualify for residency restrictions to calculate the very best use of your property.
Remaining Ideas: Grey Areas
I’d by no means advocate discovering methods to avoid the brand new guidelines, however there are some grey areas that astute buyers might benefit from.
In the event you stay in a piece of your property whereas additionally utilizing it as a short-term rental, your tax legal responsibility will probably be decided based mostly on the share of the home you occupy. In actuality, it’s unlikely that an IRS consultant will go to to confirm the apportioned use of your rental.
If sure areas, such because the kitchen and TV areas, are collectively used, their delineation turns into much more opaque. Throw ADUs, completed basements, and attics into the combo, and who lives in what components of the property presents an fascinating proposition for an accountant who is aware of how far to bend the foundations.
Conversely, and fewer doubtless to attract consideration, is to merely ramp up your short-term revenue as a lot as attainable whereas making the most of renovation and depreciation tax deductions. Pay the brand new taxes as required, and revel in night time’s sleep.